WHY OIL GOES BAD….AND HOW YOU CAN PREVENT IT

DF Sales&Marketing

Oil Tech Moderator
In part from jarrod potteiger, machinery lubrication magazine

I decided to write on this topic because I continually hear people say that oil doesn’t go bad, it just gets dirty. This implies that if you keep the oil clean, it will last forever. This is not true. I am frequently dismayed to see how many people simply don’t change the oil, [or don’t change it when they should] In certain machines [engines and other equipment].
In general, all in-service lubricants will fail at some point. That being said, there are numerous ways to manage the condition of a lubricating oil and extend its life significantly. There are three primary causes that necessitate an oil change:
1) degradation of the base oil.
2) depletion of additives
3) contamination
some of these conditions can be remedied, yet others cannot.

Base oil degradation

base oil degradation May be the most common reason for oil failure. The most common type of base oil failure is likely oxidation. When oil oxidizes, the primary by-products are acid and insoluble materials, which can lead to serious surface deposits and corrosive wear. To address this problem, most lubricants are formulated with antioxidants, but they don’t last forever.
Like many lubricant additives, oxidation inhibitors are used up as they perform their intended function. Once these additives are consumed, the base oil begins to oxidize. Many factors contribute to oxidation including heat, contaminants and base oil quality. Oil temperature plays a large role in the rate of oxidation. For every 10-degree celsius increase in oil temperature the rate of oxidation doubles.
Contaminants also cause significant changes to the rate of oxidation, acting as catalysts for the reaction or, in the case of air, providing one of the reagents. Certain wear metals can dramatically increase the rate of this reaction, especially in the presence of water.
The quality of the base oil used in the lubricant plays a role as well. Lower quality base oils tend to contain more inherently unstable constituents such as aromatics and other unsaturated hydrocarbons which more readily react with oxygen.
In addition to oxidation, base oils can fail due to thermal degradation, hydrolysis and various chemical reactions with contaminants. While mineral base oils and polyalphaolefins (paos) have good hydrolytic stability, several types of synthetics are prone to reacting with water, which forms corrosive acids.
While it May be impractical to forever prevent base oil from failing, we can dramatically impact the oil’s life by managing the influencing factors. Managing the oil’s temperature, selecting a good-quality base oil, monitoring antioxidant concentration, and preventing or removing contamination goes a long way toward extending the lubricant’s service life.

Additive depletion

although many additives such as antioxidants enhance the properties of the base oil, other additives perform functions the base oil cannot. Antiwear, extreme pressure, detergents and dispersants are examples of such additives. Even if a lubricant’s base oil is in good condition, the lubricant can no longer perform all of its duties when certain additives are depleted and, therefore, must be changed.
Additives are depleted by a number of different mechanisms. Water can react with certain additives (hydrolysis), and also can attract and remove others (water washing). Some additives are removed by particle contaminants (particle scrubbing), and others are simply used up when performing their intended functions.
Once again, these processes cannot always be eliminated, but they can be minimized. By using a well-chosen lubricant, maintaining proper oil temperature and controlling contamination, we can prevent any unnecessary additive loss, thereby extending the useful life of the lubricant.

Contamination

many types of contaminants contribute to the degradation of lubricating oils, but that’s not the worst of it. Of course, we all know that contaminants such as particles are responsible for the majority of mechanical wear in many components. Because of this, we often change oil before it fails, simply to remove the contamination.
For systems with no means of contamination removal, such as mechanical filters, this is the only way to control contaminants and ensure proper lubricating conditions. However, changing oil to remove contamination will be only partially effective, at best.
When the oil is changed, many times a significant portion of the old contaminated oil is left behind [a good example of this is when you are servicing an automatic transmission].
Extending the life of your lubricants, for the most part, is a worthwhile endeavor. If you examine the cost of changing the oil in the average machine [or engine for that matter], you might be shocked to see what you spend. The keys to achieving maximum life from lubricants are proper selection, temperature management, good oil analysis and contamination control.
Just remember to keep the oil clean, cool and dry.

Editor’s notes on this headline article……

I was really glad when I came across this article as it covered a topic which many of us in the oil industry have encountered hundreds, perhaps even thousands of times in our careers.
Mr. Potteiger certainly did an outstanding job identifying and focusing in on the various aspects of “why oil goes bad” in a very easily understood manner.
One of the facts which are mentioned several times during the article is the quality of the base oil used in the formulation of the product. This was like getting back to “lubrication 101” as it is the building block of a quality product…..base stocks can be compared with building foundations, the better the foundation, the stronger the structure will be (oil formulations are, after all, a series of molecular structures).
There are literally hundreds of different base stocks which are available and used by oil formulators for various reasons, one might be the fact of keeping costs down to be price competitive by using a less expensive, lower quality product, but you certainly cannot expect to get the best performance from oils formulated in that manner.
Another point, although, sadly not expounded upon enough is the quality and amount of additives used in the formulation. Here again, like base oils, there are hundreds, perhaps thousands of different combinations of chemicals available which oil formulators can use.
The quantity and quality of the additives used in a finished product will fortify the base stock accordingly.
Consequently, the better quality base oil stocks combined with the better quality additive packages will result in products which will perform at the utmost level of expectation.
Where are we going with this? Of course, regular readers of this publication already know that swepco brand lubricants use nothing but the finest quality mineral oil stocks in their formulations combined with the most effective state-of-the-art proprietary additive chemistry packages available.
Swepco lubricants are generally higher in price than those commonly found in the market, that’s because they do not use cheap ingredients which May compromise the quality of their products. It doesn’t matter what industry is served, from industrial plant applications to high performance racing, customers can rely on one thing….quality….. "it doesn’t come cheap, and it pays for itself many times over in the long run!"

dick floryanowich
 
This was a good read! Thanks. I check in at machinery lubrication's webpage occasionally. Gotta quick question. I've been discouraging folks from using multi-weight motor oils in their manual transmissions. I've been countered with the easier shifts, motor weights vs gear weights on the chart, blah, blah. The deal is I've read that the gearing puts the oil through more shearing than what it gets in an engine. That leads to more severe viscosity additive depletion. Not a big deal with straight weight like 30 or 50. So I say multi-vis motor oil doesn't last as long in a gear box as gear oil. I can't find where I've read it, or where I've put it for that matter. So what's your take on it?

Gr
 
Re: Transmission Oil Applications Motor Oil vs. tranny oil

Greg,

your response to your friends about using multi-vis motor oil in transmissions is right on the money, however, being old-school as I am, I really don't believe in using anykind of engine oil in transmissions....engine oil is for engines, transmission oil is for transmissions.

To be sure there is a lot more shearing going on in manual transmissions than there is in engines, the multi-vis oils will shear out faster than straight weight oils will because of the vi improver, but there are also other factors to consider as well.

Engine oils have a completely different chemistry than transmission oils have, they use a different blend of detergents for one thing and are made to hold water in suspension until it is "cooked-out" from the heat of normal engine operation.

Years ago, heavy-duty manual transmissions called for straight 50 weight, non-detergent engine oil instead of gear oil. Also, at the same time many others, especially the european car manufacturers were recommending 90wt "gl-4" gear oil for their fussy transmissions. Both of those recommendations are the same viscosity and neither one of them have highly active sulphur-phosphorous compounds which can attack the yellow metals in the syncros. Swepco's gl-5 gear oils are compatible with yellow metals and are commonly used in applications which call for gl-4 lubricants - primarily because you get the added benefit of having extreme pressure additives.

Here's where the confusion comes in.....you must know if your transmission manufacturer (or builder) recommends gear oil, or a lighter weight oil similar to an atf. Once you know this, using a high quality product which contains extreme pressure additives will give you the correct shifting characteristics and afford the best protection for the transmission. Transmission failures can really be ugly from financialy as well as the physical, including breaking down somewhere out in the toules when you are out there "having fun."

swepco manufactures straight weight gear oils as well as multi-weight, but my favorites always have been the multi-weight, either the 201 - 80/90, or the 210 - 80/140. If you experience a lot of off-roading, or heavy footing, the 210 would be my first choice, and it is more energy efficient than even the 201 - 80/90 is. Another plus for using one of these is the fact that you can use the same oil in the differentials. If you are designer prone, the 201 is dyed blue, and it is commonly referred to by users as "blue-goo" because of it's tacky characteristics when cold. The 210 is dyed red, but it doesn't have a fancy name like "goo" (besides goo doesn't rhyme with red).

As far as the lighter weight atf type oils, swepco 714 - 20wt or 30 - wt oils would be the way to go, but bear in mind that the 30wt might be a little more stiff shifting in colder climates. The 714 oil contains extreme pressure additives as well.

Anyhow, that's my take on using what I feel is the correct oil for the application.....hope it helps!

Dick floryanowich
 
Dick: it helps a lot. It's rare to find old school techs who know what the hell they're talking about online. My old 60 f100 owner's manual says to use 90wt in the trans, or 50wt non-detergent As an alternative. Speaking of european, hillman spec'd straight 30wt for their manuals back in the day. It's hard to find non-detergent nowadays, so "everybody's" onboard for the latest and greatest, but not the best in my book. Oil spec's for manuals also took into account synchro friction coefficients, a small detail often unheard in some circles. Following your advice keeps it simple. So what's in the 210 that's safe for manual transmissions, and still protects hypoids in the diffs? I thought because the boundary protection built into hypoid oils, couldn't co-exist with yellow metals.
 
Greg,

thanks for your kind words.

I can tell that your background is more extensive than the average guy out there as far as lubrication is concerned.

Once again, you are right, or at least right in the sense that you can speak of what you know and understand. Evidently you are not familiar with some of the "other" technology that is out there.

Swepco is one of a few smaller manufacturers who have produced gear oil which is compatible with yellow metals as well as having the capability of protecting the hypoid gears in differentials. It is in the type of extreme pressure additives used that makes the difference. Yes, they are more expensive than others, they not only work, they outperform the standard gl-5 oils on the market. Usually, given the same application in gear boxes, you can usually see a definite difference in operating temperatures, with 25% or more not being unrealistic. And they are more compatible with seal materials than others are, especially the popular synthetics on the market. I have landed more sprint car teams with the 210-80/140 who used to use redline shockproof gear oil than I can count, with the following results:
1) no more puddles of gear oil under the car in the race trailer.
2) an average of 25 degree f reduction in gear oil temperature (taken with a heat gun)
3) longer equipment life.....many teams with excess of 5 seasons on the same ring & pinion gears!

Whether it is automotive, trucking, construction, industrial plants and even racing, they have a product which excels, it's just a matter of matching up what is best suited for the application.

I'm not sure how to post a pdf file onto Jeff's system yet, but if you would like to respond personally and give me your email address, I'd be glad to send you a viscosity equivalents chart which you might find interesting.
 
I'd be glad to send you a viscosity equivalents chart

Thank you, but I already have some.
When my present supply of chevron's gear 90 runs out, I will look you up for a swepco replacement.

Best of luck!

Gr
 
Back
Top