Ordered by rebuild kit from IHPA and jumped into the process yesterday. 63 Scout 80 completely original with presumed 50k on it. It was leaking from a number of places so I opted to rebuild. Carb is mostly in great shape. Still has the heat shield under the carb. The bowl is not bent at all and the carb cleaned up well.
My questions:
1- economizer is no good. The spring is messed up and the pin seems pretty worn and was stuck in a down and crooked position when I opened it. The top of the seat area also seems to be a bit bent. IHPA doesn't show the "fixed" one from Robert kenney being available but I will call them to verify. Any suggestions?
2- my throttle linkage is in the outer "cold weather" hole and appears to have been there it's entire life. Just a guess. If I move it to the regular hole, it appears that it is not allowing the accelerator pump to fully disengage. It is close but I might not know until I install it. If it is not fully disengaging I am assuming it is going to constantly be dumping fuel but I could be wrong. Thoughts? It was running fine in the outer hole but I was also getting 10mpg.
3- I am in socal and the main jet is a 62. I read a number of sites that mentioned 59 as the standard. Ok to start with the 62 or is it going to be too big?
I have read the numerous threads, all very helpful. Thanks in advance for any help.
My questions:
1- economizer is no good. The spring is messed up and the pin seems pretty worn and was stuck in a down and crooked position when I opened it. The top of the seat area also seems to be a bit bent. IHPA doesn't show the "fixed" one from Robert kenney being available but I will call them to verify. Any suggestions?
2- my throttle linkage is in the outer "cold weather" hole and appears to have been there it's entire life. Just a guess. If I move it to the regular hole, it appears that it is not allowing the accelerator pump to fully disengage. It is close but I might not know until I install it. If it is not fully disengaging I am assuming it is going to constantly be dumping fuel but I could be wrong. Thoughts? It was running fine in the outer hole but I was also getting 10mpg.
3- I am in socal and the main jet is a 62. I read a number of sites that mentioned 59 as the standard. Ok to start with the 62 or is it going to be too big?
I have read the numerous threads, all very helpful. Thanks in advance for any help.